Escalation
May. 12th, 2004 11:15 amYou know, we'd just worked ourselves into a nice self-flagellation frenzy over how EVIL we are for the way some people have treated Iraqi prisoners, and then the Islamic Extremists comes along and do something so much more horrible that our guys end up looking like petty children.
Anyone proud to be a member of the human race right now? I thought not.
(Yes. I watched the video. It was horrible, disturbing, sickening. We can't afford to hide from this.)
Anyone proud to be a member of the human race right now? I thought not.
(Yes. I watched the video. It was horrible, disturbing, sickening. We can't afford to hide from this.)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 10:43 am (UTC)Where do we go from here? This execution isn't something that hasn't been done before. It hardly stands to reason that Abu Ghraib was the straw that broke the camel's back, despite the claims.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 10:48 am (UTC)It's a really media-savvy move, waiting for the furore to just start to die down, and then re-igniting it with this act.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 02:29 pm (UTC)I suspect Tony Blair has more to fear from this than George Bush.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 02:31 pm (UTC)That was always true, wasn't it?
(And it's a shame)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 02:49 pm (UTC)Now, the Archbishop of Centerbury, who has actually met and discussed this with Blair, says that he thinks that Blair is doing what he believes to be right. Given that the ABoC opposes the war, I'm inclined to trust his judgement on this.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 02:51 pm (UTC)That's interesting. The prevalent conspiracy theory in the US is that Blair supported Bush in exchange for Bush's support for greater UK integration into the EU, which Blair is seen to want. Why Bush's endorsement would actually help in this regard is never adequately explained.
Given that the ABoC opposes the war, I'm inclined to trust his judgement on this.
That sounds right to me, I think.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 06:24 pm (UTC)I'd not heard that theory before, but I could see how it works, if you consider it more like Blair saying to Bush "you won't stop being friends with me if I start being friends with them, will you?"
(Simplistic, I know, but I do think at times that politics is just the playground writ large.)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 07:52 pm (UTC)But leaving that aside -- personally, as an American, I find getting into the whole "which is worse, sexual abuse by Americans or murders by extreme Islamicists" debate unhelpful. The point is, that's *not* what we're supposed to be doing over there.
There's absolutely no question in my mind that al-Qaeda and other fanatic groups who fall into that general mindset are the bad guys, and must be stopped. They really *don't* need to keep providing brutal, sadistic, horrifying reminders in the form of videotaped beheading murders, or mass murder of people in America or Spain or Saudi Arabia, in order to keep that fact clear in my mind. Perhaps there are other more forgetful sorts who have more trouble with the concept, but I'm not among them.
But none of that changes the fact that what the U.S. MPs (and anybody who may have been egging them on) did at Abu Ghraib was bad, evil, sickening, against Geneva Convention and just wrong, wrong, wrong. And since the whole case for the U.S. being over there kind of rests on the premise that we're supposed to be better than al-Qaeda and better than Saddam, things like this are a real problem. There's just no getting around it.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-12 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-13 02:38 am (UTC)