More on copy protection
Nov. 25th, 2002 12:31 pmRegular readers will be aware that I'm the sort of person who does not download MP3s illegally, but fill my iPod with songs from CDs I own, or MP3s I've bought from sites like MP3.com and eMusic.com. I listen to more music using my iPod, or on my computer, than I do in any other way. Thus, it annoys me no end when a CD is copy protected, because the purchase of that CD gives me a fraction of the listening opportunities of a conventional CD, at the same price. I'm not going to pay the same amount of money for less value.
Now, of all people, Microsoft have come out and said that copy protection won't work. Maybe it has the muscle to make the music industry listen.
Now, of all people, Microsoft have come out and said that copy protection won't work. Maybe it has the muscle to make the music industry listen.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-25 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-25 06:14 am (UTC)I have the same problems that you have, except I don't own a "stereo", I use my computer to play music. I picked up a copy protected CD by accident and took it back the next day. I won't buy from the company that produced the album and most likely won't buy anything from that artist. I wonder how much money artists will lose by going with copy protected CDs?
Re:
Date: 2002-11-25 06:19 am (UTC)The utterly ignores people like me and you. I buy a huge number of CDs, but I will not be buying any copy protected ones. The actions of people like me and you mya drive down sales further, but the record companies will continue to blame file-swapping and not their own actions. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Re:
Date: 2002-11-25 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-26 06:58 pm (UTC)The selection's eclectic, but it's nice for finding stuff you haven't heard before (at least for me).
Re:
Date: 2002-11-27 04:09 am (UTC)